Study Suggests QoL Assessments Do Not Support First-Line Combination Chemotherapy With Weekly Paclitaxel for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

July 21, 2020 6:00 pm

The following article is provided by The Clearity Foundation to support women with ovarian cancer and their families. Learn more about The Clearity Foundation and the services we provide directly to women as they make treatment decisions and navigate emotional impacts of their diagnosis.


By Susan Moench, PhD, PA-C

Results of quality of life (QoL) assessments from the randomized, phase 3 ICON8 study evaluating once-weekly vs thrice-weekly administration of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer do not support use of the former regimen. These findings were published in Lancet Oncology.

Results of the JGOG-3016 study showing that administration of weekly dose-dense paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) in combination with thrice-weekly carboplatin was associated with improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and no QoL detriment compared with every 3-week administration of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.The ICON8 study ( Identifier: NCT01654146) was designed to evaluate this question in predominantly European patients, given known pharmacogenomic differences in Asian compared with White populations.

Previously reported results for the ICON8 study showed no improvement in PFS — a primary study endpoint — between patients with epithelial ovarian cancer randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive first-line chemotherapy with thrice-weekly paclitaxel in combination with thrice-weekly carboplatin (group 1), weekly paclitaxel in combination with thrice-weekly carboplatin (group 2), or weekly paclitaxel in combination with weekly carboplatin (group 3).3 The analysis reported here focused on the QoL of the patients enrolled across the 2 study arms, which was a prespecified secondary endpoint of the ICON8 study.

Patients enrolled in the ICON8 trial received chemotherapy within 2 weeks of study randomization, either upfront interrupted by delayed primary cytoreductive surgery or not, or following primary cytoreductive surgery, based on oncology care team choice.

Patient QoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28 global health questionnaires, which were completed at study enrollment and prior to each chemotherapy cycle. These surveys were then performed every 6 weeks for 9 months, then every 3 months for 2 years, and finally, every 6 months for up to 5 years.

No significant QoL difference was found when a cross-sectional comparison of QLQ-C30 global health scores at baseline and 9 months following randomization was conducted across study arms.

Nevertheless, a longitudinal analysis of QLC-C30 global health scores from randomization to 9 months showed significantly worse mean QoL scores in those receiving once-weekly vs thrice-weekly paclitaxel (ie, =.043 for comparison of group 2 vs group 1, and =.0018 for comparison of group 3 vs group 1).

“These findings indicate that patients receiving weekly paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy had slower improvement in their overall [QoL] during treatment itself, but recovered to a similar level to those receiving 3-weekly treatment at 9 months,” the study authors noted.

Of note, a post-hoc analysis that incorporated timing of primary surgery showed that the baseline QLQ-30 global health score was lower for those undergoing delayed surgery, and the difference in longitudinal QoL from randomization to 9 months between treatment groups was less pronounced, compared with those undergoing immediate surgery.

The study authors noted that “the contrasting results of ICON8 and JGOG-0316 support a differential response to dose-dense paclitaxel between Asian and White patients. With no [PFS] benefit and poorer [QoL], the ICON8 results do not support the general use of weekly treatment among a primarily European population.”

However, they added that “by allowing more precise dose modulation and symptom management, weekly treatment might still be appropriate for some patients,” and concluded that “for patients undergoing upfront surgery, weekly paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy should not replace 3-weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as the standard of care for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, since it neither improves [PFS] nor is associated with improved [QoL].”

This article was published by Cancer Therapy Advisor.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Return to Blog Home Return to Clearity Foundation Home